By implementing RPA on the processes that can be automated from day one, accounting teams can immediately free up capacity with a minimum of disruption that typically occurs when new process standards are introduced
Finance departments can save from 25,000 hours of avoidable rework caused by human errors by deploying robotic process automation (RPA) in their financial reporting processes, reports Gartner.
Yet, it finds only 29 per cent RPA adopters have implemented the technology for financial reporting, leaving major efficiency gains.
Gartner says it studied the use of RPA in finance departments through interviews with more than 150 corporate controllers, chief accounting officers (CAOs) and chief accounting leaders to determine the main benefits of implementing RPA within the financial reporting process and identified three key roadblocks that are currently hindering broader adoption.
“While 88 per cent of corporate controllers expect to implement RPA by next year, we routinely encounter hesitancies when it comes to applying RPA to financial reporting processes,” says Dennis Gannon, research vice president at Gartner’s finance practice.
“When viewed from a narrow ROI perspective, financial reporting appears to be a low priority compared with other business initiatives,” says Gannon.
“The departments that have experimented with RPA in their reporting processes, however, report a series of additional benefits, from less staff time fixing mistakes and more time allocated to higher-value work. The result is typically higher employee engagement and less turnover.”
Gartner says its survey reveals three roadblocks finance leaders experience when considering implementing RPA: a hesitancy to remove human judgment from the process, perception of low ROI and process standardisation delays before implementation.
RPA is best applied to manual, repetitive actions that a human would otherwise complete with a computer.
Most employees will welcome the opportunity to avoid tedious rework in favour of the more strategic activities that only a human can do
CAOs and corporate controllers have been hesitant to deploy RPA full-scale within the financial reporting process, relying on staff interaction points for steps deemed still beneficial from human judgment. However, this approach limits the upside of RPA’s benefits while still introducing human error and the need for rework.
“Maintaining unnecessary human interaction points indefinitely creates a ceiling on the benefits of RPA,” says Gannon.
“CAOs and controllers we’ve seen overcome this roadblock have created tandem systems set for a limited period of time.
“This allows accounting leaders to test the performance of a fully automated process against the traditional manual approach and provides proof of the efficiency and accuracy of RPA, without the need for human intervention points.”
Most CAOs and corporate controllers are forced to prioritise RPA activities based on a lack of resources and their role in managing a cost center, where they are consistently asked to do more with less.
Using a typical, cost-centric ROI formula focused on full-time employee time savings tends to prioritise RPA opportunities within financial reporting for other business opportunities.
“Accounting leaders who fully embrace RPA go beyond simplistic metrics and view the technology as a boost to their employee value proposition,” says Gannon. “Most employees will welcome the opportunity to avoid tedious rework in favour of the more strategic activities that only a human can do.”
Gartner research has found that the average amount of avoidable rework in accounting departments can take up to 30 per cent of a full-time employee’s overall time. This equates to savings of 25,000 hours per year at a cost of US$878,000 for an organisation with 40 full-time accounting staff.
Avoiding implementation delays
A final roadblock in full-scale RPA implementation for financial reporting is a belief by accounting leaders that the process must be standardised before it is implemented, says Gartner.
Interviews with CAOs and controllers revealed a common belief that without standardised processes, the failure rate due to exceptions was much more likely. These potential failures within financial reporting processes were viewed as riskier compared with other automation opportunities due to the risk of financial misstatements or missed reporting deadlines.
“By implementing RPA on the processes that can be automated from day one, accounting teams can immediately free up capacity with a minimum of disruption that typically occurs when new process standards are introduced,” says Gannon. “This ultimately increases speed to adoption and the benefits that come with RPA.”
CIO newsletters for regular updates on CIO news, career tips, views and events. Follow CIO New Zealand on Twitter:@cio_nz
Send news tips and comments to email@example.com @divinap
Join the CIO New Zealand group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.